Quiénes somos
La propiedad industrial e intelectual es nuestra pasión.
Las ideas y la innovación son nuestro motor.
Trabajamos incansablemente para salvaguardarlos y ayudar a nuestros clientes a innovar y ser motor de cambio.
En HOYNG ROKH MONEGIER sabemos que nuestros clientes precisan de un abogado especialista en propiedad industrial e intelectual que conozca su industria, que sea franco, directo y capaz de cumplir. Pase lo que pase.
Contamos con un equipo en Europa de más de un centenar de profesionales de la propiedad industrial e intelectual. En la firme creencia de que la calidad jurídica no puede quedar comprometida, decidimos dedicar nuestra práctica exclusivamente a la propiedad industrial e intelectual y a materias regulatorias conexas. Contamos también con la experiencia y con los conocimientos técnicos necesarios para enfrentarnos a los desafíos tecnológicos que frecuentemente protagonizan los conflictos en materia de propiedad industrial. Nuestra experiencia y nuestra mentalidad pionera se alían en la representación de asuntos de gran envergadura que en muchos casos son transfronterizos.
HOYNG ROKH MONEGIER es la firma de referencia en materia de propiedad industrial e intelectual en Europa.
Últimas Noticias
UPC Unfiltered, by Willem Hoyng – UPC decisions week 12, 2026
Below, Prof. Willem Hoyng provides his unfiltered views on the decisions that were published on the website of the Unified Patent Court (“UPC”) last week. His comments offer a unique insight into the UPC’s case law, as he chairs the Advisory Board of the UPC and participated in drafting the Rules of Procedure of the UPC.
Interested in more of this? Stay tuned and subscribe here for weekly updates.
On the go, multi-tasking or just prefer to listen? “Willem Hoyng’s UPC Unfiltered AI Podcast” – your weekly, AI-generated podcast discussing Willem Hoyng’s commentary on UPC case law of last week, offers a convenient alternative. Listen on Spotify or Apple Podcasts.
Chambers & Partners Europe Guide 2026
HOYNG ROKH MONEGIER has once again been recognised in the Chambers & Partners Europe Guide 2026, with rankings spanning multiple jurisdictions and practice areas.
UPC case law on claim interpretation
As of the launch of the UPC in June 2023, the case law ruling on the interpretation of claims was eagerly awaited. Starting with a brief overview of the key points set out in the EPO’s Enlarged Board of appeal decision G1/24 we present four relevant UPC decisions discussing how the case law of Court of Appeal (CoA) on claim interpretation has evolved in view of G1/24.
In the hallmark decision 10x Genomics v. NanoString (UPC CoA 335/202) the Court of Appeal has determined the key principles for claim interpretation regarding patentability and infringement of claims.
By way of further UPC CoA decisions, namely Insulet v. EOFlow (UPC CoA 768/2024), Meril v. Edwards (UPC CoA 21/2025), and Alexion v. Amgen (UPC CoA 405/2024) we highlight how the CoA adopted the principles set out in 10x Genomics v. NanoString. The decisions discussed herein reflect the efforts of the EPO and UPC towards harmonized case law on claim interpretation.