Representative matters
- Astellas v Sandoz. Defending Astellas in invalidity proceedings relating to its patent and SPC relating to mirabegron for use against overactive bladder.
- Astellas v generics. Defending Astellas in invalidity proceedings against their compound and formulation patent regarding Xtandi tablets to treat prostate cancer.
- Data Detection Technologies v. Doytec. Obtained the first order granting leave for a detailed description and seizure of documents and a sample from the Local Division The Hague of the Unified Patent Court (UPC).
- Pfizer v. GSK. Defending Pfizer in respect of alleged infringement of 3 GSK patents regarding an RSV vaccine.
- Essity. Representing Essity in various patent infringement proceedings related to various types of dispensers.
- Philips v. Lidl. Representing Philips in proceedings before the Supreme Court concerning copyrights on a shaver.
- Hanwha Solutions Corporation v. LONGi Solar. Representing Hanwha in patent infringement proceedings regarding solar panel technology, obtaining a cross-border injunction in the Netherlands without there being a Dutch part of the enforced European patent had no Dutch part.
- H&M v. Adidas. Represented H&M in the appeal filed by Adidas to the Supreme Court against the judgment of the Court of Appeal of The Hague, which ruled that H&M did not infringe on several 3-stripe trademarks of Adidas with the Work Out clothing equipped with 2 stripes. The Supreme Court rejected the appeal.
- Astrazeneca v. Sandoz. Represented AstraZeneca in two proceedings before the Supreme Court in cases in which Sandoz had appealed (Faslodex). The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals
- Easy Sanitary Solutions v. Group Nivelles. Represented Easy Sanitary Solutions in cases before the EU Court of Justice and the General Court in a case concerning the validity of registered Community design rights in an elongated shower drain
- Astellas. Represented Astellas in proceedings before the Supreme Court and before the Court of Justice of the EU in which, among other things, the questions arose as to what is the standard for granting a disclosure claim and for the assessment of a nullity defense to such a claim.
- Solvay v. Honeywell. Represented Solvay in Case C-616/10 before the CJEU and argued that a nullity defense raised in proceedings to obtain a provisional cross-border injunction against patent infringement does not preclude the international jurisdiction of the court to impose a cross-border injunction against infringement. The EU Court of Justice agreed.
- Monsanto v. Cefetra et al. Represented Monsanto in Case C-428/08, the first case before the EU Court of Justice on the scope of protection of biotech patents.